Want to Understand Race? Let’s Acknowledge Our Implicit Biases First

By Joseph Rendeiro, Media Relations Associate, NCLR

“Not to sound racist, but….”

“Why isn’t there a ‘White Entertainment Television’?”

“He’s so cute…for a black guy.”

In what seems like ages ago (aka two years) for the social media universe, a viral video called “Sh*t Girls Say” blew up on the Internet, inspiring hundreds of equally humorous parodies for every possible type of person, from Asian grandmas to hobbits. And while the videos were meant to be funny, highlighting extreme stereotypes in jest, reading video creator Francesca Ramsey’s thought process behind the making of her video sheds light on how something seemingly innocuous can offer legitimate social commentary. For Ramsey, the video is based on her real-life experiences and meant to both make people laugh and open their eyes to how they treat others of a different race.

Race is a difficult topic to address and often one that gets overlooked. Yes, we have Black History Month and Hispanic Heritage Month. Societal changes have spawned younger generations that are generally more inclusive and recognize that racism is unacceptable. But the reality is that many of us continue to treat people, and oftentimes people of color, differently because of our own biases, which, to be fair, most of us don’t recognize we hold on to.

With the help of partners such as NCLR, NAACP, and a host of others groups, MTV recently launched the “Look Different” campaign, an initiative aimed at younger generations to combat inequality based on race, gender, and sexuality. The campaign spotlights implicit bias—attitudes that a person may hold about another group of people at an unconscious level—that can manifest in exactly the kind of language Ramsey uses in her video. These comments and actions may not be intentional or have any malice behind them, but their effects are nonetheless damaging for minorities.

LookDifferent_logoThe “Look Different” campaign is focusing on race and ethnicity first, providing teens and young adults with a number of tools to help them not only recognize bias but also address instances of bias when they witness or experience them. Part of NCLR’s broader body of work is aimed at teaching the public, and particularly youth, about the effects of racial and ethnic bias, so we specifically worked with MTV to ensure that stereotypes and biases about Latinos and immigrants were addressed. Users can learn about the common types of racial bias that they may engage in without realizing it. For example, the site explains the concept of microaggressions, which are seemingly harmless phrases that add up to make people feel as though they are different or don’t belong.

The overall goal is to change people’s attitudes with the language and tools necessary to discuss a subject that many feel is off limits. By challenging existing beliefs about topics ranging from undocumented immigrants to affirmative action, we hope to make teens and young adults think twice before they call something “ghetto” or say that their friend “only got into this college because he’s Hispanic.”

Words have an impact; it’s time we start choosing them more wisely.

Do you think that you are biased? Explore lookdifferent.org and discover how your views may shape your interactions with certain groups of people. 

The Common Core Explained in Three Minutes

There has been a lot of misinformation put out lately about the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and what it is. We’d like to help set the record straight, with some assistance from our friends at the Council of the Great City Schools. They have put together a short video explaining what CCSS is and why it’s a step forward in the right direction toward making sure our education system adequately serves all our kids.

Evidence-Based Practices and Mental Health among Latino Youth: A Review of the Issues

By Patricia Foxen, PhD, Deputy Director of Research, NCLR

JUVENILE JUSTICE LatinAmericanCoalition-02_resizedIt is safe to assume that people who are concerned with the well-being of Latino families and youth—whether those people be policymakers, funders, advocates, clinicians, or community members—support effective, research-based mental health programs for Latinos. What is less clear is what that research and those programs look like. For nearly two decades, there has been push-and-pull between supporters of mainstream evidence-based practices (EBPs)—mental health treatments that have been proven to be effective through scientific study—and proponents of culturally centered interventions. These are programs that are designed to meet the mental health needs of particular groups, such as Latinos, within their environments and communities.

The idea of having a body of EBPs is alluring to many stakeholders because, ideally, it promotes clear-cut standards, measurable outcomes, and high-quality services. A very popular EBP in mental health, for example, is cognitive-based therapy, which has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment for a range of mental health and behavioral problems across different groups, including Latino youth.

However, some important critiques of EBPs have been mounted over the years, particularly as they apply to communities of color. These critiques are important to heed, as they may help explain why major mental health disparities for communities of color continue to exist.  Continue reading

It’s National Women’s Health Week. Let’s Pledge to Take Care of Our Health!

By Marcela Vargas, Project Coordinator, Institute for Hispanic Health, NCLR

nwhw-profile-photoWhile health is always on our minds here at NCLR’s Institute for Hispanic Health (IHH), this week we are particularly thinking of women’s health.

Last Sunday was Mother’s Day and it kicked off National Women’s Health Week, led by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Women’s Health to encourage women to prioritize their physical and mental health. Women were also encouraged to take steps such as paying attention to mental health, eating healthy, participating in physical activity, and getting regular checkups and health screenings.

Here at IHH, we have our own efforts to promote women’s health. Among these efforts is our project Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte(Healthy Woman, Strong Family)—funded by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—which educates women in Chicago and Washington, D.C., around cervical cancer prevention through community health workers.

Cervical cancer prevention is also near and dear to us at IHH for many reasons. Latinas have the second-highest rate of both contracting and dying from cervical cancer out of all racial and ethnic groups. Despite this, Latinas are not getting screened for cervical cancer as regularly as is recommended.

But it’s not all bad news. Not only is cervical cancer preventable, but it is also easily treated if caught in early stages. Getting routine Pap tests is a valuable way of identifying cervical cancer when treatment is still simple and effective. The CDC reports that 60 percent of cervical cancer cases occur in women who have never received a Pap test or have not been tested within the last five years.

Today is the last day of National Women’s Health Week, but that doesn’t mean we can forget about our health. You can take your own steps to help yourself or a loved one prioritize a healthy life. Pledge to become a well woman and educate yourself about Latinas and cervical cancer.

Advancing the Promise Made in Brown v. Board of Education 60 Years Later

By Leticia Bustillos, Associate Director, Education Policy Project, NCLR

BrownvBoard_FB-06 (2)_blogsThis weekend we commemorate the day the highest court in the land declared in one voice that “separate but equal” has no place in our country and that all children, regardless of ethnicity or race, are entitled to an equal education. Because of the landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education on May 17, 1954, “equity” and “excellence” are not mutually exclusive terms used to describe an ideal education. They are also expectations that we have for all children when it comes to their opportunities to learn and to achieve. The legacy of Brown v. Board of Education cannot be disputed: the opportunities available today to our community are greater than they have ever been in our history.

Today, more than four million Latinos over the age of 25 have Bachelor’s degrees or higher. In 2012, nearly three-quarters of Latinos attained high school diplomas; and in fall 2014, almost three million Latinos enrolled in college, representing a 9 percent increase over just a decade ago. Latinos hold some of the most prestigious posts in our government; examples such as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor demonstrate the potential of our diverse Latino community.

While we celebrate these tremendous accomplishments, our triumphs are tempered by education challenges that remain to be addressed:

  • Less than a quarter of Latino students are proficient in reading and math in fourth and eighth grades, respectively.
  • At least one quarter of Latino youth failed to attain a high school diploma.
  • As much as 30 percent of the Latino students entering college require some form of remediation.
  • In 2011–2012, only 10 percent of U.S.-born Latinos earned Bachelor’s degrees.

On the eve of the 60th anniversary of Brown v. Board, we must draw attention to these startling facts and challenge ourselves to do more to change them. Children deserve more than access to education; they also deserve for that education to be of quality.

forthecore_math_May2014_new

This was crystallized in Chief Justice Earl Warren’s majority opinion: “In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.” Though change has been slow and far from equal, we have reason for hope. With the adoption of college and career-ready standards in 44 states, we are holding ourselves accountable to ensure “equity and excellence” is not just the ideal, but the reality in our schools. In adopting the Common Core State Standards, we have declared in one voice that no single group of students is better than others, and that all children have the capacity to achieve greatness.

It is as true today as it was 60 years ago, that education, as Chief Justice Warren wrote, “is a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values, in preparing him for later professional training, and in helping him to adjust normally to his environment.” Our children’s education should not be left to luck or happenstance. It must be a right guaranteed to them on equal terms. To do otherwise negates our responsibility to our children and undermines the legacy of Brown.

This Week in Immigration Reform – Week Ending May 16

Immigration_reform_Updates_blue

Week Ending May 16, 2014

This week in immigration reform: Poll finds that 71% of tea party voters support immigration reform; after meeting with President Obama, law enforcement officials state changes could be coming to Secure Communities; anti-immigration candidate loses Nebraska primary to more moderate opponent; and Senate democrats continue to pressure House Republicans on immigration.

–Poll finds that 71 percent of tea party voters support comprehensive immigration reform. On Wednesday, The Partnership for a New American Economy, Americans for Tax Reform, and the Tea Party Express released a national survey of 400 Republican primary voters who identified strongly or somewhat with the Tea Party movement. 71 percent said it’s important that Congress act on immigration reform this year, while 70 percent support a plan that provides legal status or U.S. citizenship for undocumented immigrants who pay penalties, taxes, pass criminal background checks and learn English and American civics.  In an Op-ed, Sal Russo, co-founder and chief strategist for the Tea Party Express, encouraged conservatives to start leading in reform: conservatives need to seize on immigration reform in order to reaffirm who we are and what makes our country great.”

–Local law enforcement officials met with President Obama to discuss immigration reform and changes to immigration enforcement practices.  After the meeting, local law enforcement officials stated that they anticipate there will be a “reboot” of the Secure Communities program. They also mentioned that Secretary Johnson is aware of problems with the program that uses federal databases to determine if people detained by local law enforcement should be removed.

–Nebraska Primary sees harsh anti-immigrant candidate lose to moderate opponent. On Thursday, Shane Osborne who fervently opposed comprehensive immigration reform, lost to more pragmatic opponent Ben Sasse. While Sasse says he won’t negotiate on an Obama endorsed bill, he said he’s committed to practical solutions. While Osborne signed a pledge from FAIR to oppose amnesty, increases in illegal immigration, and increases in the number of guest workers, Sasse abstained from signing said pledge.

–Senate Democrats continue to pressure House Republicans to allow a vote on immigration reform. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid addressed the Senate floor on the importance of passing immigration reform before the June-August legislative window closes. Senator Schumer echoed Senator Reid’s remarks and warned House Republicans that if an immigration bill didn’t pass this year, there wouldn’t be an opportunity to address reform until 2017.

 NCLR and Affiliates in action.

  • Texas: NCLR’s Civic Engagement Project Manager Janet Hernandez, in collaboration with START Center, held a Colonia leadership summit on Monday and Tuesday in San Benito, TX. The summit encouraged leadership development in communities where there’s strong Latino presence. 

ImmReformUpdate_5_16_2014

NCLR continues to drive calls into the office of Majority Leader Eric Cantor through our Spring Into Action Campaign.   Check out our new graphic and share it on Facebook and Twitter!

ronanfarrowshow_sharegraphic_blog (3)

 

GSE Bill Passed in Committee Doesn’t Do Enough for Latino Community

HFG_LOGO-FullColor-horiz 6 4 12With a 13–9 vote, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs approved the Johnson-Crapo government-sponsored enterprise reform bill yesterday, which would restructure our nation’s housing finance system. While our nation’s housing market is in need of a major overhaul, the legislation approved today simply doesn’t do enough to ensure affordable access to mortgages for Latinos and all communities of color.

In a statement, NCLR President and CEO Janet Murguía expressed serious concerns with the bill:

“Our housing finance system must, above all, maintain a duty to serve all creditworthy borrowers. Although there are components of this bill that we support, the legislation as a whole misses the mark because it fails to ensure that Latinos and other traditionally underserved communities won’t be unfairly cut off from affordable mortgage credit.

“In fact, this bill could actually make getting a mortgage tougher for middle- and low-income families, the same families who were hurt most by the predatory lending and irresponsible gambling practices of financial institutions that led to our housing crisis. We are deeply disappointed by the unwillingness of some members of the committee to adequately address the mortgage credit needs of our community.”

Murguía also stressed that despite the bill’s problems, opportunities still exist to improve it:

“While we are disappointed with the current version of the bill, there is still time to fix the serious structural problems that exist within this legislation.To create a housing finance system that works for all Americans, our concerns about access and affordability must be dealt with before the bill moves to the Senate floor.”