We must work together to secure the future of our nation’s children.
Americans believe in a fair economy that provides a chance for all people to succeed. Our nation’s tax system should reflect those values.
But the current Republican tax plan will hurt the economy, cost us jobs, and lead to huge cuts in programs that help our community, working families, and children.
As the Senate prepares to vote this week on this harmful #GOPTaxScam, we sent an official letter to Senate leadership urging a ‘no’ vote.
While Americans are gathering to give thanks this week, Senate Republicans are rushing to pass a tax plan that would give large tax cuts to the wealthy, drive up the federal deficit, and make it harder for working families, including millions of Latinos, to make ends meet.
Unfortunately, this is no surprise.
CFPB Director Richard Cordray will leave the agency at the end of the month.
Last week, Richard Cordray announced his resignation from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), where he served for nearly six years as the agency’s first director. The CFPB is the only federal agency with the sole purpose of protecting consumers, an incredibly important function for all Americans in the wake of the financial crisis.
Under Cordray’s leadership, the consumer agency has helped put Latino families, and all Americans, on a path to greater financial security through its enforcement work. For example, about a dozen CFPB actions have been made against financial companies that demonstrate clear evidence of charging minority borrowers more for products. For example, in 2013, the CFPB ordered:
Altogether, the CFPB has returned about $12 billion in relief to 29 million consumers. We thank Cordray for this service and call for his replacement to defend and extend the bureau’s work to protect American consumers.
By Stephanie Presch, Content Specialist, UnidosUS
UnidosUS supports tax reform that puts more money in workers’ pockets. Unfortunately, that is not contemplated in the GOP tax plan.
The GOP tax plan takes a swipe at everyone but the wealthiest Americans and corporations. It’s a morally reprehensible plan that would deliver between $10 and $40 in tax cuts to the bottom two-fifths while cutting taxes by $278,370 for the top 0.1%.
“This plan benefits the wealthiest, and wealthy corporations, especially Donald Trump and his own cabinet,” Jeremy Slevin, Associate Director of Advocacy for the Poverty to Prosperity Program at the Center for American Progress told attendees yesterday at a briefing hosted by UnidosUS on Capitol Hill to educate congressional staffers and allies on how the GOP tax plan will affect Latino families across the United States.
The tax plan released today by House Republicans has generated negative reactions from advocate groups, academics, journalists, Democratic lawmakers, and even one Republican senator. The GOP tax plan would give a shameful deficit-busting tax cut to the wealthiest Americans at the expense of working families.
UnidosUS is committed to ensuring that the tax code puts more money in workers’ pockets. That’s why we’re opposed to any plan that robs families of their hard-earned money in order to line the pockets of the already wealthy.
Attention around the gender pay gap—by which the average full-time female worker earns only 80 cents for every dollar earned by a male—has rightfully increased over the last few years.
But there is less awareness about the gender wage gap by race.
Women in general earn 80 cents for every dollar a man earns. This represents nearly $10,500 in lower annual earnings, or around $875 a month. That’s enough to pay a month’s rent in some areas of the country.
But the gender pay gap by race shows how women of color must work even harder to make the same amount as white, non-Hispanic men. Continue reading
“We will not be tricked for their treats,” Representative Pramila Jayapal said to attendees that gathered today for a rally in opposition to the GOP’s forthcoming tax plan.
Standing in front of the Capitol in Washington, legislators and activists warned attendees that the GOP’s tax plan—which is expected to be officially released this week—would strip hardworking low- and middle-income families out of their money, and give it to the wealthiest Americans.
Before the end of the year the Trump administration will be making decisions on the future of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations. This means that the lives of more than 325,000 people—including 250,000 Central American immigrants—now hang in the balance.
In this fourth installment of the TPSeano Series, we look at how ending TPS protections could impact the financial services industry. Our earlier posts in the series discussed the impact on the construction industry, what temporary protected status is and what is at stake.
As fans across the country watch the World Series between the Houston Astros and the Los Angeles Dodgers, it’s hard to miss that America’s pastime is one of the most diverse sports leagues in the nation.
And it is fitting that the two teams vying for the championship represent cities whose vibrancy is equally powered by the strength of that diversity and the contributions of immigrants.
Among the teams’ fans and in the cities they call home, there are thousands of immigrants who have Temporary Protected Status (TPS), as well as young immigrants who have grown up here and are eligible for the recently rescinded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
- In Los Angeles, there are more than 34,000 TPS holders from El Salvador and Honduras, and 123,000 young people eligible for DACA.
- In Houston, there are more than 23,000 Temporary Protected Status holders from Honduras and El Salvador and 44,000 young people immediately eligible for DACA.
Like baseball, these individuals are as American as apple pie. But recent and potential decisions by the Trump administration and Congress could put their futures at risk.
By Carlos Guevara and Sabrina Terry, UnidosUS
In the third installment of the TPSeano Series, we look at how ending TPS protections for more than 325,000 people could impact the construction industry, as well as public safety. Our earlier posts in the series set the stage about what temporary protected status is and what is at stake.